Hi, On Thu, 2022-09-22 at 12:30 +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote: > For my fellow i18n coordinator who will try to assess the situation > like I just did: the link is to an issue that’s closed. It links to a > related MR, which has been merged a while ago and is not what Milan > is trying to get approved here. The issues is closed via a commit > that contains the actual strings. I supposed that commit was on the > main branch and Milan is asking for approval to backport.
Err, right, my fault, I should rather link the commit itself, than its corresponding bug report. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/-/commit/c12bb7fa4380a28992fb99ad9e7173305b5065bc The bug had been closed by that commit ~ an hour ago. > I suppose the other new strings about icon size in the commit are not > going to be backported. I thought of using both options, to have 1:1 correspondence of the change between the stable and the development branch, but yes, I can skip it. > The second string feels a bit weird. In “and uses it”, what does the > “it” refer to? I suggest rephrasing this, e.g. "When enabled, adds > buttons to the header bar. This applies to dialogs as well. Changing > the option requires application restart." You deciphered it right, the 'it' is as 'the option'. I just changed it to your string: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/evolution/-/commit/96bdef5a015f9c1bd9736333943eaae11dc1b542 > From a pure i18n perspective, the request is reasonable and here is > approval 1/2. Please add the strings ASAP once you get the second > approval, so translators get as much time as possible before the .1 > release. Sure thing. Thank you. Bye, Milan _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
