On Mon., 3 Jul. 2017, 13:56 Alexandre Franke, <afra...@gnome.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Carlos Soriano <csori...@gnome.org> wrote: > >> There is a table on the wiki page. Coordinator satisfaction can depend > >> on a number of criteria and should be defined on a per event basis. > > > > Inside the wide satisfaction level, could it be a more or less standard? > As > > in, maybe 100 strings of quality translated? It's just to give some very > > basic guidelines, to avoid an event report like "yeah they learnt > > something". > > Did you read the page? The table and agenda address that question. > I did. I don't feel that answers my question though... > > Is the general guide I linked before good enough as a basic > > guideline for someone that wants to organise such event? > > Not really. First of all that is not what that page is for (it’s > information for people from the outside trying to join, not community > members trying to organize an event) and second of all this page needs > to be revamped (as many of the pages in that namespace). > Oh I mean as a kind of tutorial for the atendees, to avoid following some workflow that is not expected (i.e. this happened "how to build GNOME" and resulted in not so great experience) > -- > Alexandre Franke > GNOME Hacker & Foundation Director >
_______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n