Le mardi 28 février 2012 à 21:46 +0100, Andre Klapper a écrit : > Gil, > > you're as usual too fast for me. :) > > Short answer: Today I closed merchant, libgnomedb, esound, mcatalog, > desktop-data-model, gnome-cups-manager, gnome-mount. > In case they are listed on l10n.gnome.org, they should be removed.
Done. Thanks for the house-keeping! Claude > Long version, partially offtopic: > > On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 21:29 +0100, Gil Forcada wrote: > > Hi translators, > > > > Seems that we should remove does modules from l10n.gnome.org :) > > > > Andre, is there any way that we (gnome-i18n mailing list) can get > > notifications when modules are archived? > > The draft on my computer named "Killing dead projects in GNOME" > currently lists contacting gnome-i18n for exactly this reason, but it > was still on the ToDo-list until I have a better overview and more data > collected. Realized today that just asking maintainers about Bugzilla > does not make sense, should also ask about archiving in Git etc... > > <----snip---> > Killing dead projects > * Identifying dead projects > * git activity > If a project seems dead: > * Contact its maintainers - check the MAINTAINERS or .doap > file in the git repository > * Once it is decided that the project is dead: > * Bugzilla > * Close module for new bug entry > * Mass-close open tickets of the module as WONTFIX by using template > * Move to "Deprecated" classification > * File request in "sysadmin" Bugzilla product to move product > to the git archive (Z_Archived) - explain that codebase is still > accessible by adding "/archive" in the URI > * Notify l10n to remove from damned-lies > * Dead mailing lists: Do we archive them? > <----/snip---> > > Anything missing? > > In general I wonder which mailing list to use to discuss community > metrics. I ran a script for each module in GNOME Git telling me the > number of git commits in the last 1,2,3,4 years, its Bugzilla > classification, the number of open Bugzilla reports, if it's listed on > l10n.gnome.org, and which jhbuild moduleset it is part of. > Problem is that we have no "complete" data source, all available ones > are different, so I still have to manually find modules that are listed > in Bugzilla but not in GNOME Git. > Once my gathered data is clearer and cleaner I plan to publish the > results table so we can all have fun cleaning up. Or not. :P > > andre _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
