Le samedi 13 mars 2010 à 10:01 +0100, Claude Paroz a écrit :
> Le samedi 13 mars 2010 à 00:45 +0100, Johannes Schmid a écrit :
> > Hi!
> >
> > > I'd really like to fix this for 2.30, if not user upgrading tp-butterfly
> > > would suffer regressions.
> >
> > Sounds reasonable, 1 of 2 for i18n. For the other strings (the original
> > mail) I give you 2 of 2.
> >
> > Please try to be a better citizen in the next cycle ;)
>
> 2 of 2 approvals for i18n. I cannot stress more on what Johannes said.
> Anyway, thanks for contribution and your efforts!
All branches have been merged.
Thanks for your feedback and your translations.
G.
--
Guillaume Desmottes <gdesm...@gnome.org>
Jabber <cass...@jabber.belnet.be>
GPG 1024D/711E31B1 | 1B5A 1BA8 11AA F0F1 2169 E28A AC55 8671 711E 31B1
_______________________________________________
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
