>> We already have this, called obsolete: >> http://l10n.gnome.org/releases/obsolete/ > Ok. Not really obsolete... but with no plans of creating a new tarball > including latest translations in the near future.
I think that is the key point here. Whether the translations that are added after release will be used. I think, that as the standard, the module page should always also track "all" the stable branches* for which there is planned future releases. Actually I sort of thought that it was already the case :| I realize that it will require a little extra coordination work of the module maintainer, but that should be manageable. Regarding how to prioritize the modules in gnome-extras, we could also have the maintainers provide ^^__**tentative**__^^ release dates, and have it as a possibility to sort the list by these date. I will discuss this in another e-mail. Regards Kenneth * For many modules I guess just one extra branch. _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
