Petr Kovar írta:
> Luca Ferretti <elle....@libero.it>, Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:25:15 +0200:
>
>
>> 2009/4/13 Leonardo Ferreira Fontenelle <leonar...@gnome.org>:
>>
>>> The freedesktop module is used for software we don't translate ourselves
>>> (at least not with GNOME infrastructure). How should translators submit
>>> translations? Bug reports?
>>>
>> That's true: by now l10n.gnome.org could be good for translators to
>> *fetch* refreshed webkitgtk PO files (and POT file to start a new
>> translation), but webkitgtk development is hosted outside
>> {svn,git}.gnome.org, so committers[1] will be not able to *send*
>> updated PO files.
>>
>> Unless you create a "fake" webkitgtk module on {svn,git}.gnome.org,
>> used only to trac PO files (committers will put updated PO files here,
>> webkitgtk developers will grab PO file before relases).
>>
>
> The Translation Project infrastructure could also be used, for sure.
>
>
That obsolete cr^H^Hthing could be used for sure, but please, if we can,
just avoid it. Really. Anything is better than that[1], for example the
fake module above (just like with system-tools-backends) or the
Transifex instance hosted at Fedora[2], even with the privacy issues it
has (i.e. translators have to sign a license agreement and give out
personal details, which some people wouldn't like).
[1]: being able to only translate the latest tarball, therefore having
no chance to reach 100% translated strings, unless the maintainer cares
so much that he releases a string frozen tarball weeks before/after the
actual release. In fact, they don't care this much.
[2]: https://translate.fedoraproject.org/tx/
Regards
Gabor Kelemen
_______________________________________________
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
