Le lundi 30 mars 2009 à 14:32 +0200, Carlos Garnacho a écrit : > Hi!, > > On dom, 2009-03-29 at 21:18 +0200, Claude Paroz wrote: > > Le dimanche 29 mars 2009 à 15:11 +0200, David Planella a écrit : > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I just wanted to mention that after fixing this bug [1], there are a > > > few new strings in system-tools-backends which should be added to > > > Damned Lies. > > > > The problem is that s-t-b is not hosted on GNOME infrastructure. It used > > to have more translatable strings and the translation process was > > delegated to the Translation Project [3]. > > So someone has to prepare a pre-release containing a pot file, submit it > > to the TP, wait some days so as translators can submit their work, get > > back the translations in the s-t-b repo, and release a new s-t-b > > version. > > Considering the time taken by the patch in #528015 to be committed, I > > have some doubts about the speed of the above process :-( > > > > An alternative would be to delegate the translation to GNOME > > translators, and we could send a tarball with translations to the s-t-b > > (ex)maintainer. Carlos, any thought? > > I think that GNOME repos moving to git will be really helpful here. Back > then, when I chose to use the TP, there were quite a lot of strings, > quite prone to changes/additions, and s-t-b used CVS, so it quite looked > like the best option. > > Nowadays such strings actually moved to frontends (gnome-system-tools) > and the PolicyKit strings are quite unlikely to change often. So we > could just set up a clone of s-t-b in GNOME git repos, and I could push > translations there into the fdo one.
Nice plan! > > > > Claude > > > > [3] http://translationproject.org/domain/system-tools-backends.html > > > > > I do not know whether there will be time for that, but it might also > > > be worth thinking of releasing a new version of s-t-b with these > > > changes for 2.26.1, so that the translations are available to users. > > > At least one distro (Ubuntu [2]) has already patched and released > > > s-t-b. > > Hmm, if we're officially switching to git after 2.26.1, my proposal > above wouldn't work for this... I you're willing to do this, you can > send me translations (preferably using git-format-patch) and I'll apply > them ASAP in order to make a release for 2.26.1 I'm sure sysadmins would be ok to create a s-t-b clone in the current git.gnome.org infrastructure, as other modules already did. I suggest you contact owen on #sysadmin pointing him on this thread. Then just tell us when the repo is set up. Thanks. Claude > > > > > > Regards, > > > David. > > > > > > [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528015 > > > [2] > > > https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/system-tools-backends/+bug/207677/comments/6 > > > _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
