"Christian Rose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wed, 6 Aug 2008 00:09:36 +0200:
> On 8/5/08, Petr Kovar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Christian Rose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tue, 5 Aug 2008 23:24:33 +0200: > > > > But there's a big chance. Poedit's developer is actively working > > > > on the project. > > > > > > Excellent. No need to have this unnecessary discussion then. > > > > Huh? I said Poedit's developer is actively working on the project, not > > on the said (and sad) bug. I believe he is, and I hope so, but I don't > > really know. After all, the Poedit's bug tracker at SourceForge is > > public, so everyone can judge for themselves whether there is/will be > > any momentum or not. I don't see it as a matter of long-time > > development, though, but rather as something that will be solved before > > 2.26. > > Excellent then. All will be well, then, when GNOME 2.26 is near and > PoEdit hopefully includes the msgctxt support. If not, there will be > plenty of other editors to choose from. > > That was my whole point about the unnecessary discussion. I never > argued about the time frame. That's great. One more thing though: Please refer to my previous messages in the relevant threads for my points. You'll see I haven't been arguing about the time frame only. You didn't discuss them, but the points are still there. Thus the discussion has been by no means "unnecessary". Best, Petr Kovar _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
