On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:24:11PM +0100, Claude Paroz wrote: > I can understand this. On the other side, updating the current branch > gives you the possibility to test your translations in a real distro > (Fedora 9, Ubuntu Hardy, Foresight, ...)
Yes. That's true. Other outcome from GNOME 2.23/2.24 listed at DL is just to see what is our progress in GNOME 2.23/2.24. Release early (add GNOME 2.23/2.24 stats early), release often (update the stats often). :-) > > > Personally, I'd prefer to have development branch always listed at DL, > > but I am also ok with waiting about a month... > > This bug raises a similar concern: > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415315 Yes, it is somewhat similar... ... but not the same. My request is going to be implemented sooner. :-) Howgh. -- +-------------------------------------------+ | Marcel Telka e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | homepage: http://telka.sk/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +-------------------------------------------+ _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
