2008/1/14 Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Comments, criticisms? > > I'm slightly concerned by this ... libgweather does something pretty > interesting (to a small set of consumers) but the API is no way ready > for any sort of freezing. It has serious namespace and memory management > issues, among other things. > > I don't think there is any proposal here to make libgweather part of the > platform, but a) is there clear messaging about the API status? b) how > would a transition to an incompatible new version be handled?
Pretty much like for any other instable api, I think. Users will have to check for a version they support and will have to be ported. Do you want us to do the -DI_SWEAR_I_KNOW_LIBGWEATHER_IS_UNSTABLE dance ? That is easy enough, if you think it helps. Matthias _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
