Le jeudi 25 janvier 2007 à 22:02 +0100, Carlos Garnacho a écrit :
> On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 21:09 +0100, Claude Paroz wrote:
> > Le mardi 16 janvier 2007 à 11:54 +0100, Claude Paroz a écrit :
> > > Hi Carlos,
> > >
> > > Do you know if it'll still be the 2.14 version of g-s-t that will be
> > > used for Gnome 2.18 ?
> > > Regards.
> >
> > I dare insist on getting an answer to this, because it's still the 2.14
> > version that is referenced in progress.gnome.org in the 2.18 language
> > page...
>
> Oops, sorry, this mail got unnoticed amongst all the spam :). The 2.17.x
> series of g-s-t are in development in SVN trunk, and there have been
> several releases in sync with the GNOME schedule, so effectively, GNOME
> 2.18 will use g-s-t 2.18.
Thank Carlos for this clarification. Now if someone could apply this
patch in damned-lies:
Index: releases.xml.in
===================================================================
--- releases.xml.in (révision 201)
+++ releases.xml.in (copie de travail)
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@
<module id="gnome-screensaver"/>
<module id="gnome-session"/>
<module id="gnome-system-monitor"/>
- <module id="gnome-system-tools" branch="gnome-2-14"/>
+ <module id="gnome-system-tools"/>
<module id="gnome-terminal"/>
<module id="gnome-themes"/>
<module id="gnome-user-docs"/>
> AFAICS the GNOME release announcements have been including info about
> g-s-t in their NEWS and the 2.17.x tarballs in the sources, I thought
> that the translators would have noticed that. Should I have told this to
> someone? Have I missed something? I was getting wierd to get so little
> translations lately :)
Translators could have noticed, but it's always better to be as explicit
as possible.
Thanks for your great work.
Claude
_______________________________________________
gnome-i18n mailing list
gnome-i18n@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
