On 10/7/06, Priit Laes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can't we have both 2.18 and 2.14? If the problem is the amount of > time/power what it takes to generate the statistics - generation > frequency could be decreased for 2.14 series (once a few days or even a > week).
Currently all branches are regenerated in one shot, and can't separate without changes from Carlos' machine. Adding 2.14 basically means the time required to regenerate everything is multiplied by 1.5, though I don't really know the impact of additional loading on the machines. That looks like a black box to me. Abel > Keeping things near 100% is easier for me rather than discovering next > to string freeze that I have lots of modules near 50%. > > PS. Sorry, Wouter, my bad that you were the only one to receive this letter ;) > > Cheers, > Priit > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-i18n mailing list > gnome-i18n@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n > -- Abel Cheung (GPG Key: 0xC67186FF) Key fingerprint: 671C C7AE EFB5 110C D6D1 41EE 4152 E1F1 C671 86FF -------------------------------------------------------------------- * GNOME Hong Kong - http://www.gnome.hk/ * Opensource Application Knowledge Assoc. - http://oaka.org/ * My own cave: http://me.abelcheung.org/ _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
