El dom, 10-09-2006 a las 06:05 +0800, Abel Cheung escribió: > On 9/9/06, Andreas Røsdal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Besides, many gnome translators get the pot/po file from > > > l10n-status.gnome.org, which (AFAIK) simply invoke intltool-update > > > to generate the pot/po files, thus your maneuver of pot file > > > would be all gone. > > > > Who is responsible for l10n-status.gnome.org? Would it be possible to make > > intltool-update include strings for the ggz pot file, or give gnome-games > > special treatment on l10n-status.gnome.org?
I would prefer an intltool-update modification to handle those translations, instead of a hack in our side. Do you think that's possible? (I could get an intltool cvs version to add support to status pages for it as soon as possible) > > I think Carlos (CC'ed) is still responsible for that intrastructure. > I do. But this should be handled also by danilo to prevent a regression when the new status pages deprecate old system. Cheers. > Abel > > > > > > > > One more thing, is including the translation inside gnome-games > > > enough to have localized ggz library? > > > > Yes, it "just works". > > > > > Should ggz library be > > > modified in order to fetch translation from gnome-games > > > text domain, or I'm wrong? > > > > No modification of GGZ is neccesary. > > > > - Andreas > > > _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
