On 4/15/06, Clytie Siddall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> However, I don't think you can update all the POTs, for example, for > >> a range of separate directories, without updating everything else. > >> Having all the POTs in one directory really does help. > > > > However, I do appreciate that having a simple way of getting all the > > current POT files helps new teams a lot. As a consequence, years ago I > > requested there be a link on the status pages where you could download > > a tarball with "all current POT files for developer-libs" and a > > tarball with "all current POT files for desktop". I imagine that would > > not be a very complicated feature to add. > > Yes, this is the part that I also think could be useful. I gather it > didn't happen...
Correct. > > Perhaps this will become easier when we move to Pootle. I do not know. > > Perhaps someone experienced working with Pootle can answer that. > > (And I do not know when Pootle will happen, either) > > I'll <poke> Dwayne on the Pootle list. :) Umm, what I meant to say was "I do not know when the GTP will have Pootle". I think the Pootle maintainers are not to blame for that. :-) Christian _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
