On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Roozbeh Pournader wrote: > روز چهارشنبه، 2006-03-08 ساعت 15:15 -0500، Behdad Esfahbod نوشت: > > > To hide the problem, I have export LINGUAS="en fa" in my bash > > profile, so only fa.po is regenerated in my checkouts. > > I would appreciate it if you don't commit unnecessary changes to fa.po > then.
There has been a long discussion about this on various lists before. Unless the problem is solved in the build system or another way, I cannot guarantee I don't do that in the future. That means I should never ever do 'cvs ci' and have a modified source tree all the time. On the other hand, I can argue that it's not unnecessary. The fact that it doesn't have new translation is confirmed by the fact that there's no ChangeLog entry for it. The source code has changed, and the line numbers change. And no, removing 'fa' from LINGUAS is not an option either. I want to have at least one language in there to test the build process. That better be one that I can actually read and understand, as I regularly test running apps I maintain under fa_IR and check that all the strings are marked for translation, etc. If you never noticed this before, means it's not making any problem. So I don't see a real reason not to continue that. > roozbeh --behdad http://behdad.org/ "Commandment Three says Do Not Kill, Amendment Two says Blood Will Spill" -- Dan Bern, "New American Language" _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n