Le dimanche 19 février 2006 à 11:05 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : > Hi Vincent, > > On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 10:35 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > > Le samedi 18 février 2006 à 15:54 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : > > > > The patch attached to comment #10 of the bug report adds an error dialog > > > asking the user what to do (delete file or close), and another couple of > > > error dialogs; specifically, the most important addition is: > > > > Dumb question: isn't it simpler to just use another name now? We didn't > > yet release a stable version with this code, so changing the name now is > > not breaking anything... > > People using Gnome from CVS (or Ubuntu Dapper) would not find their > custom dictionary sources anymore. But, hey: things from HEAD break > sometimes. ;-) > > Anyway, as I said, the file that is causing the name clash is "stale", > and has been so since Gnome 2.0; I finally found the last working code > using a file for saving preferences: it's tagged for gnome-utils 1.4, > and it was created by GnomeConfig, before the preferences handling was > re-written to use GConf; after that, no code mentions such file. > > So we can safely assume that we can delete the file - unless someone has > created a file called "gnome-dictionary" inside $HOME/.gnome2; hence the > conservative approach. I could rename the data directory to something > like "gnome-dictionary-2.0", but think of this as a way to sanitize > the .gnome2 directory. :-)
The file comes from GNOME 2.x (it can't be in ~/.gnome2/ if it comes from gnome-utils 1.4). However, it only contained some bonoboui thing, IIRC (to configure the toolbar). Another solution is to rename the old file to gnome-dictionary.old (or .pre-2.14). Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
