On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 16:34 +0000, Calum Benson wrote: > On 16 Feb 2006, at 14:43, Victor Osadci wrote: > > > > Any chance of having a review for Epiphany ? There was a lot of > > work on > > the bookmarks system, toolbars, preferences, etc., and a review > > would be > > quite useful for the upcoming release, as well as for the next > > development cicle. > > /Possibly/ too late, I would say... it would have to be done on > Monday now, which is a full week after the string freeze. Cc'ing > gnome-docs and gnome-i18n though (and snipping usability list), to > see if they would consider it too late.
I don't really know who maintains the Epiphany Manual. There are a number of authors listed in the DocBook, but none of them are marked as maintainers. [1] The ChangeLog isn't showing many commits to the documentation this release cycle, but somebody might have edits that aren't yet in CVS. The Epiphany maintainers should probably clear this up. [1] But then, I haven't been very good about telling people how to mark authors as maintainers in their DocBook. [2] [2] For reference, put the role="maintainer" attribute on any author that is currently a maintainer. In fact, that attribute can be used on any of the crediting elements, such as editor or publisher. -- Shaun _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
