On Wed, September 14, 2005 15:37, Danilo Å egan wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Maybe we should look into providing alternative status pages until > Carlos responds. Anyone with a strong machine with a lot of unused > CPU cycles on a fat-pipe willing to donate a couple of hours of > runtime a day for our l10n-status pages?
Just wondering... Why isn't this done on a gnome.org server? Does it use too much CPU? Maybe it'd be possible to only update the data when a po file gets committed? Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
