sön 2005-08-14 klockan 15:58 -0600 skrev Elijah Newren: > On 8/14/05, Christian Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > FWIW, I never ever understood freezes this way. The way I interpreted it > > (and which to the best of my knowledge was never corrected into anything > > else) was that if a freeze was said to begin on a particular date, then > > it was to begin that date, given some appropriate time zone slack of > > course. That is, if a freeze was said to begin on Monday 8th, then we > > would start gradually enforcing the freeze when Monday 8th would no > > longer be, in any time zone of the world. > > Right, but who said the freeze started on the 8th? The schedule has > it listed on the 8th through the 10th.
Ok, it seems I misinterpreted that part. [...] > Note that the timing that Mark and I had in mind would cause no > problems with this; you'd start enforcing the freeze at the end of the > day Wednesday. Yes, we said modules would enter the freeze when they > made the release, but that's a kind of self-imposed early freeze > entry; doing it that way had the benefit of providing the maintainer > with a solid association for the beginning of the freeze in order to > help them remember it. > > But like I said above, I don't care which way becomes official so long > as one does and becomes documented so we don't hit this snag again. Ok. Thanks for the clarification. Cheers, Christian _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
