fre, 03,.06.2005 kl. 20.41 +0200, skrev Christian Rose: > fre 2005-06-03 klockan 20:33 +0200 skrev Terance Edward Sola: > > fre, 03,.06.2005 kl. 04.35 +0200, skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > Translation status changes from 2005-05-26 to 2005-06-02. > > > Total message count has changed from 40565 to 33034. > > > > > > Average change during this period was -0.990%. > > > > > > Top 5 movers of the week: > > > * Chinese Simplified (up 13.44%, now supported) > > > * Macedonian (up 7.23%, partially supported) > > > * Norwegian Bookmal (up 2.68%, supported) > > > * Bulgarian (up 1.81%, supported) > > > * Malayalam (up 1.29%, unsupported) > > > > I think it would be useful to have stats for HEAD as well. Would it be a > > lot of work to hack it up for HEAD as well, or do people think it's not > > useful since stuff in extra/office/fifth-toe isn't part of the GNOME > > core? > > IMO that's basically the case, yes. Having statistics by mail for the > core GNOME release makes a lot a sense. Having statistics by mail for > every single application out there that happens to use GNOME CVS is > probably overkill. Some application in extras might not even work, while > some others are very mature. The point is that extras is in many ways a > moving target with the modules varying very much in quality, so whether > the status is 80% or 90% or 85% should not be very relevant, at least > not relevant enough in my opinion to warrant emailed statistics on the > list. > > But that's just my opinion. > > > Christian >
I didn't know that extras e.g. was so flakey. I'll capitulate :) Cheers _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list gnome-i18n@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
