I've talked to all the necessary people, and it seems that people are receptive to having Do in Ubuntu if we want to push for it.
Again, I for one am not interested in Do in Ubuntu by default -- Unless we could do a huge amount of QA, a 1.0 release, a getting started guide, etc. As it stands, Do is not sufficiently "for human beings." David Sent from my latest-and-greatest, proprietary, DRM-enabled, crypto- locked gadget. On Oct 12, 2009, at 11:48, Joe <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the link. That answered most of my questions. > > Want about the ubuntu? Is the any effort being made to have Do > integrated with ubuntu? Do they have any crazy requirements before > they will even consider it? > > > On Oct 11, 2:39 pm, Robert Dyer <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Joe <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Why isn't Do listed onhttp://projects.gnome.org/?Isn't the point of >>> Do to be integrated with the Gnome Desktop? >> >> There was some earlier discussion on this topic. See: >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/gnome-do/browse_thread/thread/ >> 7457eb82... >> >> Basically as Alex said, GNOME Do is not officially part of GNOME. I >> don't see that changing anytime soon either. >> >> -- >> >> Robert Dyer > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GNOME Do" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gnome-do?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
