On 08/10/2012 07:15 PM, Andre Klapper wrote: > On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 12:28 +0200, Piñeiro wrote: >> Sorry Andre, I misunderstood you when >> we were talking about this at the GUADEC. > I also misunderstood you (and maybe didn't make it clear). Sorry.
And following the list of sorries, sorry for my late reply. > Other idea: > Bugzilla components can have an [optional] "Default CC" beside having > the Default Assignee and Default QA Contact. > > In case we push for an "Accessibility" component in each product (Ekiga > and Empathy already have that), a specific address that a11y can follow > could be added to the Default CC list for each a11y component (like > "accessibility-t...@gnome.bugs"). > Would that address your needs? Yes, I think that this would address our needs. Being CCed to the accessibility bugs while the default assignee remains one of the module developers makes sense to me. > > Still I haven't seen any feedback from module maintainers in this > thread, and whether an "Accessibility" component in Bugzilla would be > accepted. Feedback welcome. Well, probably it is because it was a vague idea of "some interesting modules", probably we could list them explicitly and see if someone catches the ping. Being minimalistic we can start with: * clutter (it already has cally, so we can use it or just rename it) * gtk+ (it already has gail, so we can use it or just rename it) * gnome-shell * gnome-control-center * gdm * empathy * gedit * nautilus * evince And several doubts with respect to evolution (my vote right now is no) BR -- Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias _______________________________________________ gnome-accessibility-list mailing list gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
