Since you bring it up, let's talk about it. There has not been a single accessibility bug reported by the community that was closed by the GTK+ team in two years. The calender doesn't talk, and neither do most images, regardless of the dedication of the original programmer. I submit but reports with patches to GTK+, and I am among many who are ignored. Shall we get into specific bug reports still outstanding? Shall we compare them to outstanding projects like Orca?
Bill On 12/25/11, Jason White <ja...@jasonjgw.net> wrote: > Bill Cox <waywardg...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So, how do we separate the groups that deserve accessibility funding >> under Gnome from those who seem hell bent on making life painful for >> the blind? > > I don't think this is either a helpful or productive question to ask, and I > doubt very much that there are people associated with Gnome who fall into > the > category presupposed by the question. > > If you have money that you want to put on the table, and if you're > uncomfortable donating it to Gnome, you can for example offer it as a bounty > for the completion of certain development tasks. Some software projects > accept > financial contributions under such conditions. > > If you don't have money to contribute, then I'm sure those working on ATK, > AT-SPI, Orca and associated projects would welcome bug reports, patches > or documentation. > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-accessibility-list mailing list > gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list > _______________________________________________ gnome-accessibility-list mailing list gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
