On 1 November 2010 20:10, Joanmarie Diggs <joan...@gnome.org> wrote: > I'm stripping off the other lists.
Thanks >> What do you see as the criteria for being on this page? We might be >> able to move some items from >> http://live.gnome.org/Accessibility/GetInvolved/SmallTasks >> >> or expand on those there, especially for Caribou. > > The SmallTasks page looks like it could use some updating. Yes it's getting stale now, it was initially done for the Project:Possibility SS12 and CSUN. > 2. I think that any task we identify as an "opportunity" -- be it a paid > one or a volunteer one, a big one or a small one -- should be better > defined. (e.g. along the lines of the Orca Performance Improvement > Work). Without a specific set of objectives associated with the broader > goal, and without a "go to" person, it can be hard to get involved. Quite. For the more substantial tasks I propose we think about writing a read-me or press release as the 'spec'. it really helps focus the requirements generation, gives a good intro to prospectives and help focus everyone on the goal. http://tom.preston-werner.com/2010/08/23/readme-driven-development.html http://www.quora.com/What-is-Amazons-approach-to-product-development-and-product-management Steve _______________________________________________ gnome-accessibility-list mailing list gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
