David Bolter wrote: > Diego, > > Yes, the AT-SPI is what you want. I haven't tried using the AT-SPI > without X but it would be great to know how far you can get with that > configuration. What are you building? > > cheers, > David Bolter > Diego A. Fons wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to build my own accessible application, so searching for >> info i've found that it's necessary to have AT-SPI. The problem is >> that AT-SPI needs the X libraries and i've built GTK+ using DirectFB >> port. >> Is it strongly necessary to build the AT-SPI with X? can i build it >> without X at all? (I already configured it with the --without-x flag). >> >> Regards, >> Diego A. Fons. >> _______________________________________________ >> gnome-accessibility-list mailing list >> gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list >> > Hi David,
Thank you for your reply. I'm trying to build an application that uses a touchscreen as the only input device, so i thought it would be a good idea to have a GOK style keyboard, you select the component to edit and start entering the text whit an on-screen keyboard. When i start looking at the GOK code i realized that i need AT-SPI (and GAIL?). In a mail after yours, Ariel Rios says that i must have X :( It's a very bad news, i'm going to try to build X (is x.org X11R7.2 a good idea?) but i have to be careful because the application has to run on an embedded device (cpu AT91SAM9261) and i seem X don't like embedded devices :P Regards, Diego A. Fons. _______________________________________________ gnome-accessibility-list mailing list gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
