Hi Tomas, I apologize for the offense caused by the poor grammar and vagueness of my message. I wasn't suggesting that the bug was in Speech Dispatcher, but in the LSR module that interfaces with Speech Dispatcher (which is exactly where the bug existed). I didn't even realize it until now, but the word "support" is missing from my original message. It should have read:
"Thanks for trying speech dispatcher with LSR. The module is pretty rough around the edges since Speech Dispatcher support is still under heavy development. You've likely encountered a bug." What a difference a word makes! Again, my apologies to the Speech Dispatcher project and the users on the mailing list for any confusion I might have caused. Please keep up the good work on Speech Dispatcher. Regards, Pete On 10/11/06, Tomas Cerha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Parente napsal(a): > > Thanks for trying speech dispatcher with LSR. The module is pretty > > rough around the edges since Speech Dispatcher is still under heavy > > development. You've likely encountered a bug. > > Hello Peter, > > I have to object strongly. I don't think it was your intention, but > please consider, that you may hurt other project by such a proclamation. > > Speech Dispatcher is not under heavy development for quite some time > now. What was under development lately is just the Python interface > library, but even there we were keeping the backwards compatibility very > strictly. > > We're definitely open to discuss any (even potential) problems in our > software and we never pretended it is perfect, but I think one should be > very carefull when making judgments about other peoples work in public. > > I'm sorry I had to say that. Anyway, I wish you a good luck with the > LSR project. To me it seems technologically very promising. > > Best regards, Tomas. > _______________________________________________ gnome-accessibility-list mailing list gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
