Hello, Many thanks for that info! Will have a look at it. I am running latest version of Debian, is it easy to get Orca up and running? Managed to instal Gnopernicus. Many thanks, Christian
On 2006-07-06 at 10:59 Cody wrote: >Hi, > > Orca is much better in my opinion mainly because it is scriptable, >allowing scripts to be writen to control how orca speaks and acts in >different environments. Gnopernicus does not do this. From my experience, >orca works somewhat ok with firefox, and works with gaim better do to a >special script writen to read incoming messages which some people have >problems with though others may not. Orca is all about customization, >gnopernicus is more or less wysiwyg. Gnopernicus works with gaim, but in >older versions then 1.0 you will need to export the gtk modules. > >export gtk_MODULES=gail:atk-bridge > > Orca works with gaim right out of the box. gnopernicus does not work >well, >or at all in my situation with firefox. though make sure you enable the >caret naviagation in FF when using either gnopernicus or orca. you can >read >more about orca at http://orca.gnome.org > >HTH, > Cody----- Original Message ----- >From: "Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org> >Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 10:54 AM >Subject: Gnopernicus vs Orca > > >> Hello all, >> Maybe someone on this list can tell me what is better with Orca compared >> with Gnopernicus. Can I get better access with Orca when it comes to >> reviewing the screen with the virtual focus or simular? >> Many thanks, >> Christian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> gnome-accessibility-list mailing list >> gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list _______________________________________________ gnome-accessibility-list mailing list gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
