On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:31 PM, William Jon McCann <william.jon.mcc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I think we should make try to make things work as well as we can for >> 3.0 and promise to do better for 3.2. And yes, that will mean making >> compromises and accepting an on-screen keyboard that may not follow >> the design vision to the pixel. > > I can't disagree with this attitude more strongly. It has nothing to > do with pixel precision. Caribou in particular is nothing like the > (incomplete) designs we have for on screen keyboard. > > Bottom line: universal access in the shell is a 3.2 feature - provided > the work gets done to meet our minimum requirements of stability, > performance, and design. And you get to make the rules for what is good enough for disabled users of GNOME ? I couldn't agree with this attitude more strongly. _______________________________________________ gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list gnome-accessibility-devel@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
