On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Matthias Clasen <matthias.cla...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Piñeiro <apinhe...@igalia.com> wrote: > > > > > Although move the gail implementation to gtk has his advantages, why > > this would be better that just fix them directly on gail? One of the > > big problems here is the lack of resources, so doing the move would > > add a extra work that could be used to just fix the problems. > > The move ends one of the biggest source of problems with the a11y > implementations as they are now: they are separate objects living > outside of gtk and have to duplicate lots of widget state by listening > for signals and poking at the widgets from the outside. That is both > terribly inefficient, and prone to reentry problems. Just look at how > often gailtreeview iterates over the entire model, e.g.... > > I agree with moving gail code into gtk. I remember there are several serious and old gail bugs that we found can not be fixed without accessing the private area of gtk. And I am sure the moving will give gail many opportunities to improve its performance. I would like to be involved in the project. Li
_______________________________________________ gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list gnome-accessibility-devel@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
