On 7/25/06, Bill Haneman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because of build issues I have not been able to test a11y with > gnome-session HEAD. > > Are you telling me that a11y is regressed severely in HEAD, as it > sounds?
No, I'd have to know whether it was in order to say so. I just finally caught up on part of my email and since Havoc was bringing up a bug from a few months ago (and made it sound less safe than I thought it was at that time), so I thought I'd comment. > GTK_MODULES alone will NOT work for the gnome desktop as a whole, since > libgail-gnome should be selectively included. > > Elijah, why didn't you take this to the accessibility-devel-list? accessibility was cc'ed on the bug (okay, a different alias but probably close, right?), and my reading of the bug said that it should be closable as soon as the blocking gtk+ bug was closed. It was closed, and had been for a long time. So, I added a patch and waited for about two weeks for comment, then just went and committed. I really didn't think it'd cause any adverse affects, at least not until I read Havoc's email yesterday. After that I wasn't so sure anymore. *shrug* Elijah _______________________________________________ Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list Gnome-accessibility-devel@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
