After running for 100 ps, I visualized the pullf_umbrella.xvg, in this plot I 
found the F value around 100 kJ/mol/ns. But force constant which I had set in 
md_US.mdp file was 4000 KJ/mol/ns. Does this difference show me that the US has 
not done properly?

;define        = -DPOSRES     
integrator      = md            ; leap-frog integrator
nsteps          =100000         ; 1 * 100000 = 100 ps
dt              = 0.001         ; 1 fs
nstcomm     = 10
tinit       = 0
; Output control
nstxout         = 5000           ; save coordinates every 100 ps
nstvout         = 5000           ; save velocities every 100 ps
nstenergy       = 1000           ; save energies every 2 ps
nstfout     = 5000
nstxtcout   = 5000                ; every 10 ps
continuation    = yes            ; first dynamics run
constraint_algorithm = lincs    ; holonomic constraints
constraints     = h-bonds     ; all bonds (even heavy atom-H bonds) constrained
lincs_iter      = 1             ; accuracy of LINCS
lincs_order     = 4             ; also related to accuracy
; Neighborsearching
ns_type         = grid          ; search neighboring grid cells
nstlist         = 5             ; 10 fs
rlist           = 1.2           ; short-range neighborlist cutoff (in nm)
rlistlong       = 1.4
rcoulomb        = 1.2           ; short-range electrostatic cutoff (in nm)
rvdw            = 1.2           ; short-range van der Waals cutoff (in nm)
vdwtype         = switch
rvdw_switch     = 1.0
; Electrostatics
coulombtype     = PME           ; Particle Mesh Ewald for long-range 
electrostatics
pme_order       = 4             ; cubic interpolation
fourierspacing  = 0.12          ; grid spacing for FFT
fourier_nx      = 0
fourier_ny      = 0
fourier_nz      = 0
ewald_rtol      = 1e-5
optimize_fft    = yes
; Temperature coupling is on
tcoupl          = Nose-Hoover     ; modified Berendsen thermostat
tc-grps         = Protein_POPC Water_Ces_CL        ; two coupling groups - more 
accurate
tau_t           = 0.5   0.5       ; time constant, in ps
ref_t           = 310   310    ; reference temperature, one for each group, in K
; Pressure coupling is on
pcoupl          = Parrinello-Rahman            ; no pressure coupling in NVT
pcoupltype      = semiisotropic
tau_p           = 4
ref_p           = 1.01325 1.01325
compressibility = 4.5e-5 4.5e-5
; Periodic boundary conditions
pbc             = xyz           ; 3-D PBC
; Long-range dispersion correction
DispCorr    = EnerPres
; Pull code
pull            = umbrella
pull_geometry   = position
pull_dim        = N N Y
pull_start      = yes 
pull_ngroups    = 1
pull_group0     = POPC
pull_group1     = Ces_ion
pull_init1      = 0.0 0.0 0.0
pull_rate1      = 0.0 0.0 0.00
pull_vec1    = 0 0 1
pull_k1         = 4000      ; kJ mol^-1 nm^-2
pull_nstxout    = 1000      ; every 2 ps
pull_nstfout    = 1000      ; every 2 ps
; Velocity generation
gen_vel         = no           ; assign velocities from Maxwell distribution
refcoord_scaling    = com



Would you please let me know your suggestions ?


 
Sincerely,
Shima


----- Original Message -----
From: Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu>
To: Shima Arasteh <shima_arasteh2...@yahoo.com>
Cc: 
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 9:41 PM
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Umbrella Sampling _ pulled ion



On 7/24/13 11:53 AM, Shima Arasteh wrote:
> Yes, Thanks.
>
> Would you give me a hint on this fact that how I would be sure that I am 
> running a correct US ? with proper settings?

Either the restraint distance is maintained with acceptable sampling around 
that 
distance (given the force constant) or it's not.

> To save time, I' d prefer to run the US.mdp just for one window. Do you agree 
> with me that if I run an incorrect US for any of the windows, I would get an 
> odd result for npt_US or md_US?
>

It should be pretty easy to see.

-Justin

> Many many thanks for your time and suggestions.
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Shima
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Justin Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu>
> To: Shima Arasteh <shima_arasteh2...@yahoo.com>; Discussion list for GROMACS 
> users <gmx-users@gromacs.org>
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 8:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Umbrella Sampling _ pulled ion
>
>
>
> On 7/24/13 11:30 AM, Shima Arasteh wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to run US on a system composed of lipid bilayer/ ion/ water/ 
>> peptide. The peptide is inserted through the lipid bilayer and I' d like to 
>> study the ion conduction through the peptide across the membrane.
>>
>> In order to do so, I tried to set a specific ion ( Ces with the atom number 
>> 85563) as the pull_group1 in mdp file:
>> pull_group1     = Ces_ion
>>
>> So I had to get a new group named Ces_ion contains of Ces 85563. Therefore 
>> made a new index file ( index_US.ndx). In this ndx file, there is an extra 
>> group in addition of existed groups as this( The last 2 lines in ndx file) :
>>
>> [ system]
>> ...
>> [protein]
>> ...
>> [protein-H]
>> ...
>>
>>
>> [ Ces_ion ]
>> 85563
>>
>> But after running the grompp, I get this fatal error:
>> File input/output error:
>> index_US.ndx
>>
>>
>> Would you please let me know how I would be able to define a new group for a 
>> specific ion ?
>> Did I make a mistake in defining a new group?
>
> What you did in terms of index group content is fine.  The error message means
> that the file called "index_US.ndx" is not present in the working directory, 
> or
> it has the wrong permissions.
>
> -Justin
>

-- 
==================================================

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Postdoctoral Fellow

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 601
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201

jalem...@outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441

==================================================

--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to