Hi Albert

I've been using the version dated July 2010, which seems to be the last one on the user contribution section.

I pointed the paper by Piggot and co-workers to add a point on your original question whether CHARM-TIP3P makes a difference or not. I think that the paper answer why the developer of the FF contribution recommend such water model.

Using it or not is of course up to the user and may be affected by the system and settings (my own experience is with bilayer only systems, membrane proteins may behave quite different). And I agree with you that the extra computational burden imposed by CHARM-TIP3P is something that encourages one to use the standard TIP3P, if it provides the correct answers. For instance, in the aforementioned paper, it seems that POPC is not so affected as DPPC.

Javier


El 08/07/13 11:25, Albert escribió:
On 07/08/2013 10:47 AM, Javier Cerezo wrote:
In a recent benchmark by Piggot, Piñeiro and Khalid ( http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ct3003157 ), they showed that the TIP3P flavour may affect some properties (ApL) for simulations with CHARM36, concluding that CHARMM-TIP3P is recommended, at least for DPPC.

I've also experienced similar issues with DMPC.

Javier


which CHARMM36 FF do you use? The CHARMM36 is being update from time to time.

It may have some influence on the head property of the lipids, but how much it would be for the whole protein/membrane system, it is still unclear. For the long time scaled MD simulations, many people would be hesitated to introducing charmm-TIP3P which sacrifice too much speed.....

I've also observed that in several paper, people said Na+ have influence on POPC property similar to your claims, but most people still prefer to use POPC+0.15M NaCl which is the most close system to physiology environment.

Albert

--
Javier CEREZO BASTIDA
PhD Student
Physical Chemistry
Universidad de Murcia
Murcia (Spain)
Tel: (+34)868887434
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to