Unfortunately, there's lots of areas of complex software projects where the interaction of some new feature with some old feature is not of enough interest to the people who maintained/developed those features for them to put work into them. You can file a feature request at redmine.gromacs.orgso that people know there is some interest in it - but don't hold your breath waiting!
Offhand, I can't think of a theoretical reason why that'd be a problem, but I'm an expert in neither FE calcs nor the details of CMAP :-) Mark On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 12:08 PM, francesco oteri <francesco.ot...@gmail.com > wrote: > Dear gromacs users, > can someone of you explain me why CMAP is not managed in Free Energy? > I guess that the force derived by CMAP can be traited as any other force. > Is there any theoretical problem in doing: > CMAP(lambda) = (lambda)*CMAP +(1-lambda)*CMAP > ? > > Francesco > -- > gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org > http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users > * Please search the archive at > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! > * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the > www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists > -- gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
