Try 100 ns of simulation. Also, note that g_density will not generally give you the correct result if you are using pressure coupling. This is because g_density builds the histogram up from z=0 to z=max and if you center your bilayer using pressure coupling then the center of the bilayer will not be at a constant z. To get this right requires some additional trjconv preprocessing (see my earlier posts on this topic). Nevertheless, this is not going to lead to massive asymmetry, so you are probably seeing something different.
As another note, you don't really seem to be doing a lot of work in composing your emails and checking your system (e.g "more than bad" is not helpful for us at all). You'll get more out of this list if you put a little bit more into checking your system and composing your emails to be as specific as possible. Chris. Ali Alizadeh ali.alizadehmojarad at gmail.com Fri Oct 19 02:06:08 CEST 2012 Previous message: [gmx-users] A favor question: experience running Gromacs in the cloud Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Ali Alizadeh <ali.alizadehmojarad at gmail.com> Date: Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 3:28 AM Subject: Re: Fwd: I have a symmetric simulation box To: Justin Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu> Dear Justin I ran my simulation for 8 nano second(1 ns to 8 ns) but my results was more than bad, my command for analysis of out put files: g_density -f md.xtc -s md.tpr -dens number -o dens2.xvg -d z xmgrace dens2.xvg -- Sincerely -- gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting! * Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org. * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
