On 7/12/12 4:59 AM, J Peterson wrote:
Hi Justin,

Thanks for the effort to help me.

I still no out of the error. The following is the content of my
topol_popc.top

; Include chain topologies
#include "gromos53a6_lipid.ff/forcefield.itp"
#include "popc.itp"

; Include water topology
#include "gromos53a6_lipid.ff/spc.itp"

; Include ion topologies
#include "gromos53a6_lipid.ff/ions.itp"

; System specifications
[ system ]
128-Lipid POPC Bilayer

[ molecules ]
; molecule name nr.
POPC 128
SOL 2460

And the following is the first part of my popc128b.gro file

Alm on surf + relaxed popc
14036
     1POP     C1    1   0.253   5.425   1.688
     1POP     C2    2   0.428   5.314   1.792
     1POP     C3    3   0.334   5.243   1.571
     1POP     N4    4   0.378   5.352   1.660
     1POP     C5    5   0.474   5.439   1.590
     1POP     C6    6   0.606   5.390   1.531
     1POP     O7    7   0.692   5.366   1.643
     1POP     P8    8   0.834   5.316   1.587
     1POP     O9    9   0.800   5.197   1.505
     1POP    O10   10   0.903   5.435   1.533
     1POP    O11   11   0.890   5.266   1.729
     1POP    C12   12   0.823   5.142   1.753
     1POP    C13   13   0.836   5.086   1.895
     1POP    O14   14   0.766   4.964   1.924
     1POP    C15   15   0.632   4.959   1.944
     1POP    O16   16   0.555   5.019   1.869
     1POP    C17   17   0.589   4.833   2.020
     1POP    C18   18   0.615   4.703   1.944
     1POP    C19   19   0.595   4.575   2.025
     1POP    C20   20   0.625   4.467   1.920
     1POP    C21   21   0.677   4.340   1.987
     1POP    C22   22   0.813   4.357   2.055
     1POP    C23   23   0.848   4.223   2.120
     1POP    C24   24   0.884   4.121   2.012
     1POP    C25   25   0.957   4.013   2.043
     1POP    C26   26   0.994   3.986   2.189
     1POP    C27   27   1.069   3.853   2.202
     1POP    C28   28   0.967   3.739   2.204
     1POP    C29   29   1.012   3.593   2.202
     1POP    C30   30   0.916   3.478   2.169
     1POP    C31   31   0.869   3.518   2.029
     1POP    C32   32   0.801   5.205   1.983
.
.
.
.
.

What are the parts mismatching in these files?

From what's shown, it's impossible to tell. Based on this information, everything lines up. I'm assuming the original coordinate file and the popc.itp topology came from Tieleman's site?

Since it says the atom names from the top file will be used, is it safe to
ignore this warning too?


No. The naming mismatches imply that grompp is trying to map parameters for lipids onto water molecules. The resulting simulation will be nonsense and will probably crash immediately.

-Justin

--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================


--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
* Only plain text messages are allowed!
* Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
* Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to