On 6/6/12 7:36 AM, Amir Abbasi wrote:


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Justin A. Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu>
*To:* Amir Abbasi <amir.abbas...@yahoo.com>; Discussion list for GROMACS users
<gmx-users@gromacs.org>
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 6, 2012 3:58 PM
*Subject:* Re: [gmx-users] Atomtype OW_tip4p not found



On 6/6/12 7:19 AM, Amir Abbasi wrote:
 > Hi!
 > I use tleap to generate topology file of a RNA molecule with parmbsc0 ff. 
Then I
 > generate .gro and .top files of that with amb2gmx.pl <http://amb2gmx.pl>.
 > I'm manually add this lines to .top file
 > ; Include water topology
 > #include "amber99sb.ff/tip4p.itp"
 >
 > ; Include topology for ions
 > #include "amber99sb.ff/ions.itp"
 > but after running this code:
 >
 > grompp -f ions.mdp -c ribozyme_solv.gro -p ribozyme.top -o ions.tpr
 > I've got this error message:
 >
 > Program grompp, VERSION 4.5.5
 > Source code file: /build/buildd/gromacs-4.5.5/src/kernel/toppush.c, line: 
1166
 >
 > Fatal error:
 > Atomtype OW_tip4p not found
 >
 > what should I do?
 >

If I recall my Amber evolution correctly, parmbsc0 and Amber99SB are different
entities, so you may have some inconsistencies in your force field calls. Which
of the Amber force fields in Gromacs have you called (earlier in the topology)?
The OW_tip4p atom type exists in Amber99SB, so I don't know the origin of the
error.

-Justin

I've Removed these lines from .top file

; Include water topology
#include "amber99sb.ff/tip4p.itp"

; Include topology for ions
#include "amber99sb.ff/ions.itp"
But this error occured:

Program grompp, VERSION 4.5.5
Source code file: /build/buildd/gromacs-4.5.5/src/kernel/toppush.c, line: 1987

Fatal error:
No such moleculetype SOL

what's the true way to add solvent molecules to my system?
I want to use parmbsc0 ff that's not included in gromacs and I use it with 
amb2gmx


Please answer the question posted above by posting a relevant topology snippet. It's hard (impossible) to help you while working in the dark. Presumably you have some force field you are calling - what is it?

Removal of these lines will not solve the problem, as you can see. You need to #include a water model of some sort to define what parameters water will have, but it needs to be consistent with whatever force field you are using or have otherwise constructed.

-Justin

--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Research Scientist
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to