Dear gromacs users

In a recent paper I found the following protocol of a gromacs simulation:

"All simulations were performed with the GROMACS 4.0 [12] compiled in single-precision mode at a constant temperature of 277 K in a periodic box with an edge length of approximately 8.2 nm and the default GROMOS-96 43A1 forcefield [22]. The simulation systems each contained approximately 16,500 Simple Point Charge (SPC) water molecules [23]. Short-range interactions were evaluated using a neighbor list of 1.0 nm updated at every 10 steps. Van der Waals interactions used a cutoff with a smoothing function such that the interactions slowly decayed to zero between 0.75 nm and 0.90 nm. A long-range analytical dispersion correction was applied to the energy and pressure to account for the truncation of the Lennard-Jones interactions [24]. Electrostatic interactions were evaluated using the particle mesh Ewald (PME) [25] with a real space cutoff of 1.0 nm, a spline order of 6, a Fourier spacing of 0.1 m, and relative tolerance between long and short range energies of . All bonds to hydrogen were constrained with LINCS [26] with an order of 12, and a time step of 2 fs was used for dynamics."

In the gromacs manual 4.5.4, page 104 it says: "The GROMOS-96 force field was 
parameterized with a Lennard-Jones cut-off of 1.4 nm, so be sure to use a Lennard-Jones 
cut-off (rvdw) of at least 1.4".

Is it a good idea to set "DispCorr" to "EnerPres" and reduce the rvdw so 
dramatically (almost the half value)?

And a second question: Is there a study on the percentage of information 
getting lost when reducing the rvdw with and without dispcorr (e.g. to 1.2, 
1.0, etc) if the forcefield was parameterized with 1.4?

best,
Bernhard



--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to