I disagree.

What one is generally trying to obtain with elevated temperatures is enhanced sampling, not temperature-dependent properties. I believe that even TIP4P-EW is not very good at getting the properties of water correct at 600 K, temperatures that are commonly used during replica exchange simulations (not to mention that nobody has any idea how accurate protein forcefields are at temperatures other than the one at which they were parameterized).

So I think that doing simulations at massively elevated temperatures can possibly be useful.

That said, while doing simulated annealing, I have found previously using charmm that once you get to about 3,000 K you will get chiral inversions that can not resolve at lower temperature. This is because our improper dihedral terms only maintain the given chirality, rather than favouring one over the other.

To address your question directly, I believe that chiral inversions will be a big problem for you at 20,000 K. Obviously you also have simulation stability issues, but one presumes that you could resolve those by using a small enough timestep.

Chris.

-- original message --

At that temperature most matter is going to be a plasma, not many bonds to be simulated and a lot of free electrons.

Warren Gallin

On 2012-03-28, at 4:43 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:

[Hide Quoted Text]
On 29/03/2012 9:39 AM, Asaf Farhi wrote:
Dear GMCS users

Hi. Does anyone know if MD at 20000K is feasible?
Please start new email threads rather than hijacking old ones.

I doubt anybody knows the answer to your question. Force fields are parameterized to reproduce data at around 300K. I can't imagine any possible use for simulating an MM force field at a temperature hotter than the sun.

Mark
--


--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to