On 29/02/2012 9:05 PM, aiswarya pawar wrote:
Mark,

In the g_mindist output data gives which atom was within cutoff to protein atom ie the output file of g_mindist

What makes you think there is only one atom satisfying that cutoff?


5.000000e+02           518         42680
5.010000e+02           518         20942
5.020000e+02           518         67844
5.030000e+02           518          5984
5.040000e+02           518         67844
5.050000e+02           518          5984
5.060000e+02           518         30116
5.070000e+02           518         67844
5.080000e+02           518         32957
5.090000e+02           518         67844
5.100000e+02           518         19610
5.110000e+02           518         19610
5.120000e+02           518         22895
5.130000e+02           518         30116
5.140000e+02           518         19610
5.150000e+02           518         22895
5.160000e+02           518         13628
5.170000e+02           518          5984

2nd column is the protein atom and the 3rd column the water atom.

Chunk of output from an unnamed file without giving the command line that generated it is close to useless :-) Anyway, whatever information is present here is not helping you observe the duration of a contact between the protein and any given water molecule.


if iam doing g_dist how is it possible to know the which water molecule has to be considered for the distance calculations ie should i compute the distance between one protein atom against all the water within the cut off individually?

If you have read g_dist -h and want to ask this question, then I did not understand your previous statement of your objective.

Mark


Thanks

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Mark Abraham <mark.abra...@anu.edu.au <mailto:mark.abra...@anu.edu.au>> wrote:

    On 29/02/2012 7:21 PM, aiswarya pawar wrote:
    Mark,

    i want to know which water atoms stay within a cut off to protein
    atom.

    OK, but as you will read in g_mindist -h, it will count such atoms
    and not identify which they were...


    ie i need the duration at which a water resides on the protein atoms.

    ... and identity of the atoms is needed for measuring duration of
    contact. g_dist does something like this, and reading g_mindist -h
    should have prompted you to find this out.

    Otherwise, you will have to construct an index group for each
    water molecule, and script a loop to examine each water molecule
    separately using some tool that observes what you really want to
    measure.


    so for that i need the whole 5ns frames because am looking for
    water molecules which reside more than 50% of time.

    You also need to be clear about whether you care about continuous
    contact. Does a water molecule that oscillates at a distance
    around the cutoff reside about 50% of the time?

    You still don't need high time resolution for testing whether this
    analysis might give you the information you want. The water
    molecules that are in contact for more than 50% of the time
    (continuous or not) will show up in 5 snapsnots spaced every
    nanosecond. 5000 snapshots every picosecond is better, but not if
    you can't afford to wait for it.


    Mark


    Thanks

    On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Mark Abraham
    <mark.abra...@anu.edu.au <mailto:mark.abra...@anu.edu.au>> wrote:

        On 29/02/2012 6:01 PM, aiswarya pawar wrote:
        Mark,

        Right now am computing distance between each protein atom
        against all water atoms,

        That's expensive. mdrun goes to great lengths to speed up
        computing billions of distances.

        which is taking too long for 5ns run. i cant reduce the frames

        Yes you can. Even if you think you need data from every
        frame, you probably don't because they're correlated with
        each other, and at the very least you can do a pilot study on
        a frame every 100ps or every nanosecond before committing to
        one on all the frames.


        either the number of water atoms. So is there any alternate.


        You are not likely to get a better solution if you only
        describe your attempt, rather than describe the objective.
        Asking "how do I hammer harder?" if you're hammering a screw
        makes it impossible to get the correct solution "Use a
        screwdriver".

        Mark


        Thanks

        On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Mark Abraham
        <mark.abra...@anu.edu.au <mailto:mark.abra...@anu.edu.au>>
        wrote:

            On 29/02/2012 5:17 PM, aiswarya pawar wrote:
            Dear all,

            Am running g_mindist on large number of atoms, i would
            like to know whether i can run this on more than one
            processors say 8 processors to speed up the task?

            No. If it will take too long, you need to reduce your
            number of frames (trjconv), or the number of atoms (also
            trjconv), or some such.

            Mark


            and will this effect the output in anyways.

            Thanks,

-- Aiswarya B Pawar






            --
            gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
            <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
            http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
            Please search the archive at
            http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search
            before posting!
            Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list.
            Use the
            www interface or send it to
            gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
            <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>.
            Can't post? Read
            http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




-- Aiswarya B Pawar

        Project Assistant,
        Bioinformatics Dept,
        Indian Institute of Science
        Bangalore






        --
        gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
        <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
        http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
        Please search the archive at
        http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before
        posting!
        Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
        www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
        <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>.
        Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




-- Aiswarya B Pawar

    Project Assistant,
    Bioinformatics Dept,
    Indian Institute of Science
    Bangalore






    --
    gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
    <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
    http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
    Please search the archive at
    http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
    Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
    www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
    <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>.
    Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




--
Aiswarya  B Pawar

Project Assistant,
Bioinformatics Dept,
Indian Institute of Science
Bangalore





-- 
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to