Hi,

I have some questions.
First, what dihedral angles will Gromacs produce and use in topology when simulating proteins? To be more specific, I was looking for psi (N-C(a)-C-N) and phi (C-N-C(a)-C) angles in all the dihedrals that were generated by pdb2gmx. I only found the psi angles but not phi. Is that by purpose? Second, for testing purposes, I want to do single point energy calculations in vacuo with no cutoffs at given coordinates. When I use an mdp like the one below, it always changes the coordinates slightly but enough to change the energy values noticeably. Is there a better way to to this? Third, I'm not sure if the coordinates are used correctly. To compare the energy values, I inserted a little piece of code in the energy evaluation routines which outputs the coordinates of all atoms. It seems that everything beyond the three digits after the decimal sign in the .gro files is filled with arbitrary numbers. I know that using floating point data types results in a loss of accuracy but I thought even with single precision, the accuracy should be higher than three digits?

Here is my mdp:
constraints   =       all-bonds
integrator    =       MD
nsteps          =       0
nstcomm     =       1
ns_type        =       grid
rlist              =       0.0
rcoulomb     =       0.0
rvdw            =       0.0
Tcoupl          =       no
Pcoupl         =       no
gen_vel        =       no
pbc              =       no

I would greatly appreciate any help and comments.

Best regards,
Matthias Ernst
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to