Ah, OK. The commands I used were:

g_msd -n POPC_index.ndx  -lateral z -o POPC_150ns_CM_MSDlat.xvg -mol diffmol.xvg
g_msd -n POPC_index.ndx  -lateral z -o POPC_150ns_MW_MSDlat.xvg


> 
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/attachments/20111208/0d0d66d6/attachment-0001.html
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 12:36:49 +1100
> From: Mark Abraham <mark.abra...@anu.edu.au>
> Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Re:Re:Re: MSD normalization
> To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users@gromacs.org>
> Message-ID: <4ee16631.2030...@anu.edu.au>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> 
> On 9/12/2011 5:37 AM, Sławomir Stachura wrote:
>> Hi!
>> Thanks Mark for reply. When I calculated fractional diffusion constant from 
>> mass weighted MSD of long simulation I get sth about 0.05. But when I do the 
>> same for centre of mass, considering that MSD is expressed in nm^2, the 
>> result is 1.35. When I look into xvg file  MSD of centre of mass is 10-20 
>> times than for mass-weighted (which is substantially wrong). So assuming 
>> that, by any chance, centre of mass MSD is in A^2, calculated fractional 
>> diffusion constant is of 0.02 magnitude, which is theoretically more 
>> understandable.
>> What I can show you is a sample of two MSDs:
>> 
>> - Mass weighted:
>> 
>>          0           0
>>         15   0.0150352
>>         30   0.0198877
>>         45   0.0235849
>>         60   0.0267214
>>         75   0.0294651
>>         90   0.0319853
>>        105   0.0342538
>>        120   0.0364239
>>        135   0.0384275
>>        150   0.0403661
>>        165   0.0421938
>>        180   0.0439495
>>        195   0.0456557
>>        210   0.0472885
>>        225   0.0488768
>>        240   0.0503814
>>        255    0.051868
>>        270   0.0533207
>>        285   0.0547436
>>        300   0.0561625
>> 
>> -And centre of mass:
>> 
>>          0           0
>>         15    0.916885
>>         30     1.05944
>>         45     1.16649
>>         60     1.25004
>>         75     1.31444
>>         90     1.37307
>>        105     1.43301
>>        120     1.47879
>>        135     1.52776
>>        150     1.57137
>>        165      1.6211
>>        180     1.64439
>>        195     1.68883
>>        210     1.71222
>>        225     1.75035
>>        240     1.77255
>>        255      1.8117
>>        270     1.83702
>>        285     1.87376
>>        300      1.8958
>> 
>> 
>> But still there is more thing - do you how the MSD is normalized? Because I 
>> have compared mass weighted MSD calculated using Gromacs tool and nMoldyn 
>> and I get the same difference for all my cases (simulations of 2ns, 15ns and 
>> 150ns)- in the latter  diffusion constant is twice the value of the one 
>> obtained in Gromacs. So I expect the difference in normalization.
> 
> OK, but we need to see your terminal command lines in order to eliminate 
> your use of the tool as a source of the problem. They should be at the 
> top of the .xvg file, if nowhere else.
> 
> Mark
> 
>> 
>> Cheers,
>>    Slawomir
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 6/12/2011 3:58 AM, S“awomir Stachura wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> There is something interesting concerning these MSD calculations. If I 
>>>> treat Centre of Mass MSD  if it'd be expressed not in nm^2/ps , but 
>>>> Angstroms^2/ps, I get ideally the same results as for mass-weighted ones. 
>>>> And it's true for all my three cases, in which I performed simulation of 
>>>> different times. Is that possible there is some bug in MSD? Because as for 
>>>> me it looks so....
>>> I would be amazed if GROMACS did this. Can you copy and paste from your
>>> terminal to show this?
>>> 
>>> Mark
>>> 
>>>> Hope to have someone join the discussion,
>>>>    Slawomir
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Wiadomo¶æ napisana przez S“awomir Stachura w dniu 2011-12-04, o godz. 
>>>> 22:38:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I was just wondering how MSDs in Gromacs are normalized. I am 
>>>>> calculatiing MSDs for my lipid system of different timesteps of 
>>>>> simulation and I get much higher results for centre of mass calculations 
>>>>> in comparison to mass-weighted one.  And I thought about normalization 
>>>>> issue, but I couldn't find any informations concerning that topic in 
>>>>> manual.
>>>>> I'd be grateful if someone could explain how mean square displacement is 
>>>>> normalized.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>   Slawomir
> 

--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to