On 20/07/2011 7:33 PM, sa wrote:
Thank you Austin, for the clarification,

So my questions are: how to convert it in the gromacs format ? Is it correct to use the absolute value of the multiplicity in my parameters and use the negative values of barrier heights when they are exist in the AMBER parameters? Since, I have noticed that in the AMBER ff port in GROMACS, the multiplicity values are always set to > 0 and the barrier heights have sometime a negative value.

You want to implement the same mathematical function in each case. Take the GLYCAM parameters, drop them into the correct function. Then consult chapters 4 and 5 of the GROMACS manual and see what will be necessary to reproduce that function. Then test on a tiny system that you can also compute by hand to confirm your understanding.

Mark


Thank you again for your advice.

SA-



    Message: 1
    Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
    From: "Austin B. Yongye" <ybau...@yahoo.com
    <mailto:ybau...@yahoo.com>>
    Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Conversion of the GLYCAM dihedral parameters
           in the  GROMACS format.
    To: Discussion list for GROMACS users <gmx-users@gromacs.org
    <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>>
    Message-ID:
    <1311098935.93905.yahoomailclas...@web161426.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
    <mailto:1311098935.93905.yahoomailclas...@web161426.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

    It is normal to have combinations of negative and positive values
    for the barrier heights. Those are just the best coefficients to
    reproduce some QM rotational energy curve during the
    parameterization.  The negative periodicities are a convention
    from AMBER. They simply indicate that the dihedral angle potential
    has more than one term. For your example below:

    O2-P
-OS-CP 1 0.10 0.0 -3. Dimethyl phosphate
                                1   -0.50          0.0            -2.

             1    0.10
             0.0             1
    -3, -2 and 1 signify V3, V2 and V1 terms, respectively. Once a
    positive value is reached, terms for the O2-P-OS-CP potential have
    been completely accounted for.

    Hope that helps.
    Austin-


    --- On Tue, 7/19/11, Mark Abraham <mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
    <mailto:mark.abra...@anu.edu.au>> wrote:

    From: Mark Abraham <mark.abra...@anu.edu.au
    <mailto:mark.abra...@anu.edu.au>>
    Subject: Re: [gmx-users] Conversion of the GLYCAM dihedral
    parameters in the GROMACS format.
    To: "Discussion list for GROMACS users" <gmx-users@gromacs.org
    <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>>
    Date: Tuesday, July 19, 2011, 7:08 AM







       On 19/07/2011 11:56 PM, sa wrote:










         Dear
             GROMCS users,

         I
             am trying to convert some GLYCAM parameters in GROMACS
    format.
             For this
             purpose, I am using the latest GLYCAM parameters downloaded
             from the RJ. Woods'
             website and the examples given in the acpype code (here for
             the dihedral angles) :





    
http://code.google.com/p/acpype/source/browse/trunk/acpypi.py?spec=svn9&r=9&redir=1
    
<http://code.google.com/p/acpype/source/browse/trunk/acpypi.py?spec=svn9&r=9&redir=1>





         -------------------
    # dihedral    idivf        barrier hight/2 kcal/mol  phase degrees
          periodicity     comments
X -ca-ca-X 4 14.500* 180.000 2.000 intrpol.bsd.on C6H6

    * to convert to gmx: 14.5/4 * 4.184 * 2 (?) (yes in amb2gmx, no in
    topolbuild, why?) = 30.334 or 15.167 kJ/mol
# X -CA-CA-X 4 14.50 180.0 2. intrpol.bsd.on C6H6 (from parm99.dat)

    # X-CA-CA-X     3    30.33400     0.00000   -30.33400     0.00000
        0.00000     0.00000   ; intrpol.bsd.on C6H6

    -----------

         I have no problems with the parameters for proteins. But, in
    case of the GLYCAM parameters, I am a little confused

    about the conversion of dihedral force constants (DFC), especially
    when the DFC and the periodicity values are < 0 for example
    for this torsion:


         O2-P
-OS-CP 1 0.10 0.0 -3. Dimethyl phosphate
                       1   -0.50          0.0            -2.

             1    0.10
             0.0             1



       Where only a positive value makes sense, sometimes people use
       negative values to indicate some special functional form. This can
       be easier to code. Regardless, you'll have to check out the GLYCAM
       documentation and see what is meant, before you can address how to
       convert it into a GROMACS format. Obviously the contents of
    parts of
       chapter 4 and 5 of the manual will be important.



       Mark





-- 
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the 
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to