simon sham wrote:
Hi,
I have two questions about using the charmm force field.
1. Do we still need to use the two perl scripts, convert_charmm_ to_gromacs.pl and fix_top_for_charmm.pl?

No.

2. I got the following note when I tried to do energy minim. with grompp:

NOTE 1 [file topol.top]:
  The largest charge group contains 12 atoms.
  Since atoms only see each other when the centers of geometry of the charge
  groups they belong to are within the cut-off distance, too large charge
  groups can lead to serious cut-off artifacts.
  For efficiency and accuracy, charge group should consist of a few atoms.
  For all-atom force fields use: CH3, CH2, CH, NH2, NH, OH, CO2, CO, etc.

Is this a problem?


Yes. CHARMM topologies should not use charge groups. You should invoke pdb2gmx with the -nochargegrp option to create a proper topology.

-Justin

Thanks for your insight!

Simon


--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to