shivangi nangia wrote:
Hello Justin and everybody,

I created a system of charged polyhistdine, counter anions and just 1 DHB molecule is a box without making any change in the vdwradii.dat file.
This system does not energy minimize, it stops with the same message:

Stepsize too small, or no change in energy.
Converged to machine precision,
but not to the requested precision Fmax < 10

Double precision normally gives you higher accuracy.

What can be done to fix this problem?


Take some time to search the Gromacs website and the mailing list archive. You would have undoubtedly found either this:

http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Errors#Stepsize_too_small.2c_or_no_change_in_energy._Converged_to_machine_precision.2c_but_not_to_the_requested_precision

or the hundreds of other messages that post this message, which is neither a problem, nor an error, per se.


The part of  DHB itp file is:
[ moleculetype ]
; Name nrexcl
DHB      3

[ atoms ]
;   nr      type  resnr resid  atom  cgnr   charge     mass
     1        OM     1  DHB     OAA     1   -0.567  15.9994
     2         C     1  DHB     CAH     1    1.135  12.0110
     3        OM     1  DHB     OAD     1   -0.568  15.9994
     4         C     1  DHB     CAK     2   -0.004  12.0110
     5       CR1     1  DHB     CAG     2    0.004  12.0110
     6        HC     1  DHB     HAG     2    0.033   1.0080
     7         C     1  DHB     CAI     2    0.141  12.0110
     8        OA     1  DHB     OAB     2   -0.179  15.9994
     9         H     1  DHB     HAB     2    0.005   1.0080
    10       CR1     1  DHB     CAE     3    0.000  12.0110
    11        HC     1  DHB     HAE     3    0.000   1.0080
    12       CR1     1  DHB     CAF     3    0.000  12.0110
    13        HC     1  DHB     HAF     3    0.000   1.0080
    14         C     1  DHB     CAJ     4    0.082  12.0110
    15        OA     1  DHB     OAC     4   -0.113  15.9994
    16         H     1  DHB     HAC     4    0.031   1.0080



This topology looks like complete junk. Earlier I provided you a link to PRODRG tips and told you there was an article referenced there you should read. I certainly hope you will do so. If you run a simulation with a lousy topology, you'll get lousy results. Either the system will be unstable or the results will be completely untrustworthy.




If I have the water/methanol or water:methanol in the system as the solvent, the system runs fine.


Well, what's the solvent in the case of the unstable system? Just because some other systems appear stable does not mean anything else will be.

-Justin

--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to