Hi,

A force file like this does exist (http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp800687p) but be aware, like the CHARMM27 force field it is based upon, you will need to use surface-tension to keep these lipids in the correct phase.

Cheers

Tom

Justin A. Lemkul wrote:

Ioannis Beis wrote:
Dear Gromacs users,

I am a new user and I am trying to study the physical properties of the interactions between cytosolic proteins and lipids. I have created the Berger-Gromos combination, as described by Mr. Justin Lemkul in his KALP15 in DPPC tutorial, as well as Berger-OplsAA, as described by Mr. Chris Neale in gromacs mailing list. All-atom topologies might turn out to be crucial in my work, both in the results and the data analysis (e.g. H-bonds).

Even if the all-atom model of Opls-AA is used for the proteins, the lipid head groups would still have a united-atom description and therefore the interactions can't be treated in an all-atom level.

I thought of creating a new topology for the lipid head groups under a head.itp file, by using parameter values from Dundee server and/or Opls-AA, even though I do not know yet exactly how and I feel very unsure about the eventual incorporation into the Berger-OplsAA combination. Then taking single lipids of pre-equilibrated membranes, editing accordingly the coordinate file (i.e. replacement of polar head atoms and use of new coordinates, names and residue names for them) and subsequently building bilayers.

I would really appreciate if someone could send suggestions. In addition, if someone already has an all-atom description of lipid head-groups compatible with a protein-membrane force field combination with all-atom protein description, I would be grateful if he/she could share.

Thank you in advance.


It sounds to me like you're trying to create a Frankenstein force field. Why wouldn't a UA representation of the lipids work? For hydrogen bonding, all polar groups are represented with explicit H atoms. This is generally true of all UA force fields, for lipids and proteins alike.

If you really want an AA representation of your molecules, you're probably better off just applying the CHARMM force field to the whole system. The latest version of Gromacs supports CHARMM, which includes a number of common lipids.

-Justin


--
Dr Thomas Piggot
University of Southampton, UK.
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to