Igor Marques wrote:
dear all,


after justin contribution, the SN2 chain plot now looks a little different:
sn2_new.png
http://imm.io/5JAZ

the real matter of this e-mail, although i really appreciate the help justin has provided regarding the proper use of this tool, is the fact that my plot looks mirrored from the one i've previously referred, from Jojart and Martinek --> http://i.imm.io/5IGl.png forgetting, for now, the SN2 chain, harder to analyse, what i really found weird is the fact that SN1 is mirroring the published results:
sn1_new.png
http://imm.io/5JCi


so, for segment 2, the first they analyze, in the filled triangle line the value is around 0.35, while for the 14th segment the value is about 0.28. in my case, the order is the other way around! my SN1 starts with a low value that is increased through the chain! (0.24 --> 0.29).

should i change the order of the chain in the index files? although that makes the plot resemble the ones already published, i don't think that is the definitive solution to this problem!


Definitely not. If you look at the sn-2 chain, even counting backwards doesn't place the unsaturation in the right place.

Are you sure the membrane hasn't entered a gel phase? Are other parameters (APL, membrane thickness, density, etc) reasonable for the conditions applied? I can't reproduce this as a problem in g_order 4.0.7 or 4.5.3 - my POPC membranes look fine (granted, I've used a different force field than you, but my results match almost exactly with what Jojart and Martinek show).

If everything else in the data analysis looks normal, I am willing to help you look into this if you send me (off-list):

1. A coordinate file
2. A .tpr file
3. Any index files you're using

-Justin

(this applies also to the DMPC chains of my colleague)

best regards!
igor

      Igor Marques


On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Igor Marques <igor.drago...@gmail.com <mailto:igor.drago...@gmail.com>> wrote:


          Igor Marques


    On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Justin A. Lemkul <jalem...@vt.edu
    <mailto:jalem...@vt.edu>> wrote:



        Igor Marques wrote:

        <snip>


               2. Can you post your .ndx file?
               for sn1 chain:

            Reading structure file
            Going to read 1 old index file(s)


        Not exactly what I was going for (I wanted to see the contents
        of the .ndx file), but...


             0 C12_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             1 C29_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             2 C30_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             3 C31_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             4 C32_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             5 C33_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             6 C34_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             7 C35_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             8 C36_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             9 C37_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             10 C38_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             11 C39_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             12 C40_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             13 C41_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             14 C42_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms


        Here you only have 15 carbons.  The sn-1 (palmitoyl) should be 16.


            for sn2 chain:
            Reading structure file
            Going to read 1 old index file(s)

             0 C9_&_r_1-72         :    72 atoms
             1 C13_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             2 C14_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             3 C15_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             4 C16_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             5 C17_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             6 C18_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             7 C19_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             8 C20_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             9 C21_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             10 C22_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             11 C23_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             12 C24_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             13 C25_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             14 C26_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             15 C27_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms
             16 C28_&_r_1-72        :    72 atoms


        And the same here - 17 groups instead of 18.  I'm not familiar
        with the numbering, but it seems odd to jump from, e.g., C9 to
        C13 - are you sure your first carbon (C9) is not in the glycerol
        backbone rather than the ester?
        i'll also take a careful look into this! and the numbering is
        just like this. don't ask! ;)


               3. What is your command for the sn-2 chain?  You cannot
            obtain
               unsaturated and saturated order parameters in the same
            command.  You
               must do them separately, and the index groups are
            different.  For
               instance, to get the order parameters around the
            unsaturation, your
               index file should contain only Cn-1, Cn, Cn+1, Cn+2,
            where Cn and
               Cn+1 are the C atoms joined by the double bond.  Then run
            g_order
               with the -unsat option.  These values can then replace the
               corresponding carbon positions in the g_order output of
            the whole
               sn-2 chain.  If done improperly, you can get weird results.
               the command is actually the same with the apropriate
            index file...
               maybe this is the problem for POPC - i'll look at it
            carefully!


        Then this is certainly a problem.
        i'll look at it with my colleague. if our problem persists,
        we'll get back in touch!


thanks again! ^^

4. What are the simulation conditions? Are you trying to
            replicate
               the published work?  Different simulations conditions
            will certainly
               impact the structural parameters, and insufficient
            sampling can give
               weird looking curves, as well.  All it might mean is that
            your data
               are not yet well-converged.
               NPT, surface tension of 40 dyn/cm, t=310 K, GAFF force
            field. the
               plot represents the last 10 of 150 ns of production -
            however, it
               presents the same behavior in longer (200 ns) simulations!


        I'd suspect the index file(s) and/or g_order commands rather
        than convergence issues, in this case.

        -Justin


            thanks!
-Justin


                   best regards and thanks in advance!

                        Igor Marques


               --     ========================================

               Justin A. Lemkul
               Ph.D. Candidate
               ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
               MILES-IGERT Trainee
               Department of Biochemistry
               Virginia Tech
               Blacksburg, VA
               jalemkul[at]vt.edu <http://vt.edu> <http://vt.edu> |
            (540) 231-9080


               http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

               ========================================
               --     gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
            <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
               <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>>

               http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
               Please search the archive at
               http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search
            before posting!
               Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use
            the www
               interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
            <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>
               <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
            <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>>.

               Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists



-- ========================================

        Justin A. Lemkul
        Ph.D. Candidate
        ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
        MILES-IGERT Trainee
        Department of Biochemistry
        Virginia Tech
        Blacksburg, VA
        jalemkul[at]vt.edu <http://vt.edu> | (540) 231-9080
        http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

        ========================================
-- gmx-users mailing list gmx-users@gromacs.org
        <mailto:gmx-users@gromacs.org>
        http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
        Please search the archive at
        http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
        Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
        www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org
        <mailto:gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org>.
        Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists




--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to