Emanuel Birru wrote:
Yeah, I am using IT and do analyse the result using another method not
bar. But I used g_bar when I was using the foreign_lambda and simulate
all in a single file. I have already sent my suspect few weeks back.

Is there an active redmine issue? I cannot find any post from you in the list archive from the last few months. What is the issue?

I am a bit confused on the g_bar part, when it says -f expects multiple
dhdl files. Do we need to run still multiple independent simulations
using different foreign_lambda values? I do not see why we should run
independent simulations, if we use for couple-lambda0 and couple-lambda1
vdw-q and none respectively.


As I mentioned to the OP of this thread, simultaneous (de)coupling of vdW and Coulombic interactions is not stable. The output energies are not trustworthy, in my experience due to physically unreasonable configurations and the potential for numerical singularities.

The multiple files that g_bar expects are not simply from two separate processes, however. It expects dhdl.xvg files from multiple values of native lambda that have corresponding foreign_lambda values in it, i.e.:

Interval 1:
init_lambda = 0
foreign_lambda = 0.05

Interval 2:
init_lambda = 0.05
foreign_lambda = 0 0.1

Interval 3:
init_lambda = 0.1
foreign_lambda = 0.05 0.15

etc.

-Justin

For IT I am using 4.5.3 and it is working good so far.

Cheers,

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Justin A. Lemkul
Sent: Thursday, 24 March 2011 1:36 PM
To: Gromacs Users' List
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] no output dgdl file



Emanuel Birru wrote:
Hi Justin,

It good that the issue is solved. As per my experience if you want to
do
a series of simulations it is not necessary to use foreign_lambda, for
each simulation we can give different lambda values starting from 0 to
1( from fully interactive to non-interactive) no need of foreign_lamda

This is certainly a viable method, but it is thermodynamic integration,
not BAR. The purpose of lambda/foreign_lambda is to use the BAR method.

and certainly no need of generating dhdl.xvg to calculate FE. I think
-dhdl is an optional it will not be generated just because
"free_energy
= yes" is present. The problem with the 4.5.3 is not the problem of

It has always been my experience (in versions 3.3.3 and 4.5.3) that if
the free energy code is activated, this file is written. I never specify the file names independently.

generating dhdl data by using single simulation with all
foreign_lambda
values. The problem is with g_bar, when I tried to analyse the
dhdl.xvg
output (with all the necessary data in it) using g_bar, it doesn't
function properly. The error is related with the source code. I guess

If you suspect a bug, you should report it.  If you don't use
foreign_lambda, you can't use the BAR method. You're doing TI, not BAR. They are fundamentally different, and the analysis for TI is done independently of any Gromacs
tool.

the main advantage of using 4.5.3 to calculated FE using
foreign_lambda
was to avoid running series of independent simulations. May be it is
solved on the newer version 4.5.4., didn't try it yet.


Version 4.5.3 has worked just fine for all free energy calculations I
have done. Perhaps BAR can be done with a single simulation and multiple foreign_lambda, but that was not my understanding of the proper procedure (based on some posts by developers a few months ago). Multiple simulations, each at "native" lambda, are conducted with values of foreign_lambda above and below the native value at some lambda spacing (except for end points). Invoking g_bar gives the total DeltaG over all lambda intervals according to the BAR algorithm.

-Justin

Cheers,

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Justin A. Lemkul
Sent: Thursday, 24 March 2011 12:54 PM
To: Gromacs Users' List
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] no output dgdl file



Emanuel Birru wrote:
Hi Justin,

Sure what you wrote is correct, what I am trying to tell to him is
that
if he has more than one foreign lambda it is better to put all of
them
as it is not logical to use only one foreign lambda to calculate FE
(0
-
0.1) and he doesn't have delta lambda too. -Deffnm is sure all about
You can do a series of simulations at many values of lambda, each
specifying their own foreign_lambda. It seems to me that this method would be
more
reliable, but I have not tested simply attempting a single simulation
with all values of foreign_lambda. Using delta_lambda is (from all that I have read) not reliable, as there are known issues with "slow growth" methods.

file names but it also generate all the necessary files including the
xvg's without the need of using -dhdl.

Whether or not one specifies -dhdl or -deffnm is independent of
whether
or not dhdl.xvg (or whatever name) is written. It is controlled purely by
the
presence of "free_energy = yes" in the input file.

I would appreciate if you come up with a new solution for him.

As reported by the OP, this issue had been effectively solved already:

http://lists.gromacs.org/pipermail/gmx-users/2011-March/059631.html

-Justin

Cheers
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Justin A. Lemkul
Sent: Thursday, 24 March 2011 12:35 PM
To: Discussion list for GROMACS users
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] no output dgdl file



Emanuel Birru wrote:
Hi,

Your foreign_lambda value is only one, please put all your lambda
values
separated by space and you will get the dhdl file. And make sure
that
This is not required.  You can specify as many or as few
foreign_lambda
values as you like.

you use -deffnm when you run your mdrun to get all the out put files
by
default.

The -deffnm flag controls the names of the files, not which ones are
written.

-Justin

Cheers,

*From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Moeed
*Sent:* Thursday, 24 March 2011 4:13 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* [gmx-users] no output dgdl file

Hello,

I have a little problem with FE output file. Below is the settings
and
also I am including -dgdl in the command I issue but no dgdl (or
dhdl)
file generates. I dont figure where the problem lies ! (version
4.5.3).
free_energy          =   yes
init_lambda = 0 delta_lambda = 0
sc_alpha             =   0.5
sc-power             =   1
sc_sigma             =   0.3
foreign_lambda       =   0.1
dhdl_derivatives     =   yes
couple-moltype       =   Polymer
couple-lambda0 = vdw-q couple-lambda1 = none
couple-intramol      =   yes
nstdhdl              =   10
separate_dhdl_file   =   yes
dh_hist_size         =   0
dh_hist_spacing      =   0.1

Best



--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    [email protected]
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to [email protected].
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to