Justin A. Lemkul wrote:


vferra...@units.it wrote:
I've just tried with a single CHCL3 molecule, here's the output:

Back Off! I just backed up md.log to ./#md.log.2#
Getting Loaded...
Reading file clfmin.tpr, VERSION 4.0.7 (single precision)
Loaded with Money

NNODES=2, MYRANK=1, HOSTNAME=biohazard
NODEID=1 argc=6
Making 1D domain decomposition 2 x 1 x 1

Step -1, time -0.001 (ps)  LINCS WARNING
relative constraint deviation after LINCS:
rms 301.323604, max 324.810791 (between atoms 1 and 3)
bonds that rotated more than 90 degrees:
 atom 1 atom 2  angle  previous, current, constraint length

Back Off! I just backed up step-1b_n1.pdb to ./#step-1b_n1.pdb.2#

Back Off! I just backed up step-1c_n1.pdb to ./#step-1c_n1.pdb.2#
Wrote pdb files with previous and current coordinates

Back Off! I just backed up traj.trr to ./#traj.trr.1#

Back Off! I just backed up ener.edr to ./#ener.edr.2#
Steepest Descents:
   Tolerance (Fmax)   =  2.50000e+00
   Number of steps    =       100000
Step= 0, Dmax= 1.0e-02 nm, Epot= 0.00000e+00 Fmax= 0.00000e+00, atom= 0

writing lowest energy coordinates.

Back Off! I just backed up clfmin.gro to ./#clfmin.gro.1#

Steepest Descents converged to Fmax < 2.5 in 1 steps
Potential Energy  =  0.0000000e+00
Maximum force     =  0.0000000e+00 on atom 0
Norm of force     =  0.0000000e+00

NOTE: 7 % of the run time was spent communicating energies,
      you might want to use the -nosum option of mdrun


gcq#320: "Do You Have Sex Maniacs or Schizophrenics or Astrophysicists in Your Family?" (Gogol Bordello)

The minimum is reached without steps, so... I don't know if the single atom minimization wors or not...


It certainly didn't work. At the outset of the process, you instantly got a LINCS warning, indicating instability. This would indicate to me that the model itself is unstable. I'm sorry to say I don't know what to suggest, as the Gromos96 chloroform model should be rigid, and your topology reproduces what is in the force field .rtp entry for chloroform.


I guess I'm blaming this all on the topology, but it could also be that your coordinates are messed up and they can't be resolved by EM. Check into that, as well.

-Justin

--
========================================

Justin A. Lemkul
Ph.D. Candidate
ICTAS Doctoral Scholar
MILES-IGERT Trainee
Department of Biochemistry
Virginia Tech
Blacksburg, VA
jalemkul[at]vt.edu | (540) 231-9080
http://www.bevanlab.biochem.vt.edu/Pages/Personal/justin

========================================
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to