On 10/01/11 17:10, Christian Mötzing wrote:
Hello,

I got the waterbox simulation as a simple example to test some additions
I made in GROMACS. It only contains water molecules, so no fancy
proteins and stuff.

*What* additions?
Does vanilla Gromacs behave the same?
In both cases, which version?

On CPU it works fine, on GPU I get these values when
I extract the potential energy and the density with g_energy.
E-Pot on CPU is around -37k and density naturally not infinite. What do
I do wrong?


     0.000000  -63232.203125         inf
     2.000000  -265017.812500         inf
     4.000000  -277360.406250         inf
     6.000000  -282572.125000         inf
     8.000000  -285906.281250         inf
    10.000000  -288693.312500         inf
    12.000000  -291001.906250         inf
    14.000000  -293238.875000         inf
    16.000000  -294145.437500         inf
    18.000000  -295828.437500         inf
    20.000000  -296380.000000         inf
    22.000000  -297290.656250         inf
    24.000000  -297524.625000         inf
    26.000000  -298951.593750         inf
    28.000000  -298996.750000         inf
    30.000000  -298484.843750         inf
    32.000000  -298666.312500         inf


If vanilla Gromacs works, I'd say your code :)
If not, then please post details of your system (.mdp etc.) and the command lines you use.

m.
--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to