OK. I will use your method. But i am afraid there will be something wrong. 
Because generally, i should run the 3x3x0.8 NPT water, and then i use editconf 
to add the water to 3x3x3. If i donot run 3x3x0.8, i may not be able to run the 
final interface box. Because the water in the box is not at proper situation or 
position. Anyway, i will have a try first.

If i have problem or success, i will give an answer to all.
At 2010-12-17 09:51:57,"Vitaly Chaban" <vvcha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>Hey, gromacs -
>>>
>>>Nice to hear from you here... It is a bad idea to simulate something
>>>with any cartesian dimension lower than a couple of nanometers using
>>>classical FFs.  All your problems are generated by 0.8 nm of the
>>>z-side.
>>>
>>>--
>>>Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban
>>>Rochester, U.S.A.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks very much. I use the cutoff=0.38, because the cutoff should be 
>> smaller than the half box size. I guess it may be the Z dimension is too 
>> small, Plus the PBC. But when i use 1.8x1.8x1.8nm bulk water, all results 
>> are OK.
>>
>> My teacher wants me to simulate 3x3x0.8, 3x3x0.9 nm water film's rupture. So 
>> i have to run bulk >3x3x0.8 water and then add box to 3x3x9 to form 
>> interface.
>>
>> So if i want to run run bulk 3x3x0.8 water, how could i do? which FF should 
>> i use? the high T may be >due to EM not success??
>
>
>I believe you use the term "bulk water" in another sense as compared
>to all other guys here. When people say "bulk liquid" they imply the
>endless ocean of this liquid. It is not important what particular side
>lengths you have, since due to PBC you get infinitively large system.
>
>I suspect your teacher wants you to obtain a film of water that would
>be about 3 molecular layers wide. That's easy. Take your current box
>of water and apply editconf -
>
>editconf -f <current_conf> -o <water_film_conf> -box 3 3 3
>
>Finally, just start MD run with a water_film_conf. You'll have the
>same periodic box , but water molecules will be present only at its
>center surrounded by vacuum in one (Z) direction.
>
>Happy GROMACSing,
>
>Dr. Vitaly V. Chaban
>Rochester, U.S.A.

--
gmx-users mailing list    gmx-users@gromacs.org
http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-users
Please search the archive at 
http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/Search before posting!
Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
www interface or send it to gmx-users-requ...@gromacs.org.
Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

Reply via email to